Every single day since the Uvalda shooting, I've heard a news story about another mass shooting. And every single time it's been a personal dispute where someone pulled a gun and murdered another person, not a mass shooting. Literally just now I heard a story from CNN where the newscaster said "Another mass shooting at a hospital, just days after the high school shooting." They then threw to audio of a police chief who said in English words:
Gun prohibitionists routinely lie and distort the truth to fit The Narrative. This is one of the reasons why gun rights advocates seem so obstinate. "Common sense gun reform that we can all agree on" rings differently when it's coming from the people who have gaslit you and people like you for decades than it does to normies. See also: https://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2013/11/08/cake-and-compromise-illustrated-guide-to-gun-control/
Why do you think 'mass shooting' implies 'indiscriminate'? Looking at wikipedia: it seems definitions are mainly that 3+ or 4+ people are killed, which also fits my intuition.
That’s Not A Mass Shooting, That’s Just Sparkling Murder
Gun prohibitionists routinely lie and distort the truth to fit The Narrative. This is one of the reasons why gun rights advocates seem so obstinate. "Common sense gun reform that we can all agree on" rings differently when it's coming from the people who have gaslit you and people like you for decades than it does to normies. See also: https://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2013/11/08/cake-and-compromise-illustrated-guide-to-gun-control/
Why do you think 'mass shooting' implies 'indiscriminate'? Looking at wikipedia: it seems definitions are mainly that 3+ or 4+ people are killed, which also fits my intuition.
They have a gun control agenda to sell. And if you don't have enough crises to sell it, then you simply make more.