Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wesley Fenza's avatar

I think you're just in love and like whatever makes your girlfriend happy

Bad Horse's avatar

It seems to me that the term "gender essentialism" is an oxymoron. "Gender" is a very recently-invented term, invented specifically to mean "socially-constructed roles which we associate with sex." As gender is by definition socially constructed (and assuming the default interpretation of "social construction" which assumes that anything socially-constructed is arbitrary and could have been constructed any other way, which is idiotic--an airplane is socially-constructed, but it won't go far without wings--but I digress), gender by definition has no essential character. The /entire purpose/ of inventing the word "gender" was to assert that sex roles have accumulated a patina of socially-constructed roles as well. The idea that "gender" /replaces/ rather than supplements "sex" is even more-recent.

We really should get back to using the term "sex" when we mean sex. Keep these terms separate.

Recently I saw an article about "gender discrimination" by the Taliban. Which implied that the Taliban would not discriminate against women enacting the male gender. Absurd. The Taliban don't even have a concept of "gender"!

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?